No Toxics in Food Packaging
At a Glance
The No Toxics in Food Packaging Act would ban 3 classes of chemicals and 12 individual chemicals linked to cancer or hormone disruption from materials that come into contact with food, including materials used in food production and food processing, bulk containers, handling, transport, and final packaging materials. The bill authored by Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) and Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and is expected to be introduced in the 119th Congress in June 2026.
Download the Fact Sheet
Overview
The No Toxics in Food Packaging Act prohibits the use of the following chemicals and classes of chemicals because of their carcinogenic, hormone-disrupting, or other harmful properties.
- The class of Ortho-phthalates
- The class of PFAS chemicals
- Bisphenols (BPA, BPB, BPS, BPF, BPAF, & related compounds)
- Twelve chemicals which are recognized carcinogens:
- Acrolein
- Acrylamide
- BHA (tert-Butyl-4-hydroxyanisole)
- Chlorinated paraffins
- 1,4 – Dioxane
- Asbestos
- Benzene
- Chloroform
- Methylene chloride
- Ethylene oxide
- Formaldehyde
- Styrene Polymers
The bill prohibits the use in food contact materials by amending the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act to deem these chemicals unsafe for use as food contact chemicals.
Background
Thousands of synthetic chemicals make up the materials that come in contact with our food, from the harvesting, processing and manufacturing stages, like milking tubes and factory conveyor belts to retail packaging (i.e., sealings on the inside of jar lids, plastic containers, cans, etc.), to cooking, food storage and serving ware. Chemicals from these materials can migrate into the food and then into our bodies, and many of these chemicals have been linked to negative health impacts ranging from allergic reactions to reproductive harm, learning disabilities, and increased risk of breast and other cancers.
In the USA, an estimated 5,000 chemicals are used in food production, processing and packaging materials, called ‘indirect food additives,’ with another 5,000 used as direct additives.
Over 200 chemicals on the FDA-approved list of food contact materials have been identified as hazardous, and another 530 would qualify for official hazard classification based on predictive hazard data.[1]
A growing body of scientific evidence speaks to the urgency of this problem as researchers and health practitioners sound the alarm on toxic chemicals in food packaging. In 2018, the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a Policy Statement to draw attention to emerging child health concerns related to chemicals used in food contact materials and direct food additives.[3] In March 2020, an international group of scientists from multiple disciplines published a consensus statement expressing strong concern about harmful chemicals migrating into food from food contact materials, direct additives, and environmental contamination.[2] The 2020 Consensus Statement calls for known hazardous chemicals in any food contact articles to be prohibited.
The 1958 Delaney Clause Bans Cancer-Causing Chemicals from Food
The 70-year old Delaney Clause which amended the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1958 prohibits a chemical from being approved by the FDA for use in food if it is found to induce cancer when ingested by people or animals. However, the FDA is poorly implementing and enforcing this clause, and chemicals that are well-established carcinogens or that may contribute to cancer risk through hormone disruption have been approved by the agency for use in food contact materials.
The FDA is not properly implementing the Delaney Clause because it uses outdated science to evaluate the safety of food chemicals,[4]. This is particularly the case when it comes to understanding the characteristics of hormone-disrupting chemicals and their contributions to hormonal cancers and other diseases. At the same time, the FDA does not conduct a program of systematic re-evaluation of chemicals that were approved decades ago to ensure it has considered updated science on chemicals currently allowed on the market. As a result of these FDA failures, cancer-causing chemicals in food contact materials are legally being used in full contradiction to the Delaney Clause. A recent study found 189 substances that increase breast cancer risk are in food and beverage contact materials.[5]
Some of the most egregious examples are the chemicals and classes of chemicals that this bill would ban:
- Bisphenols (BPA and related compounds)
- Ortho-phthalates
- Per and Poly fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)
Solution
The No Toxics in Food Packaging Act of 2026 bans the 3 classes of Bisphenols, Ortho-phthalates and PFAS, and twelve more substances, deeming these chemicals unsafe for use in materials that come into contact with food (production, processing and packaging) .
- The bill applies to all food packaging, including reusable and pre-filled food and beverage containers.
- Companies would have two years to remove the banned chemicals from food production, processing and packaging materials.
- The bill addresses “regrettable substitution” – companies replacing a banned chemical with an equally or more toxic alternative, by making the FDA consider, when it is assessing alternative food contact chemicals,
- the potential adverse effects of exposure on vulnerable populations, including pregnant women, infants, children, the elderly, and populations with high exposure, including workers exposed through production practices or handling of final products.
Endorsing organizations: 2026
BCPP supports this legislation along with national and state environmental and health NGOs, farming associations, and businesses, including:
NGOs:
- Alaska Communities Against Toxics
- Alliance of Nurses for a Healthy Environment
- American Sustainability Business Network
- Sustainable Bainbridge
- Beyond Pesticides
- Black Women for Wellness
- Breast Cancer Over Time
- Beyond Plastics
- California Black Health Network
- California Communities Against Toxics
- California Environmental Voters
- California Health Coalition Advocacy
- California Healthy Nail Salon Collaborative
- Californians Against Waste
- CalPIRG
- Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice (CA)
- Center for Environmental Health
- Center for Food Safety
- Clean Earth 4 Kids
- Clean Water Action
- Consumer Reports
- Friends of the Earth
- Green America
- GMO/Toxin Free USA
- Habitable
- Able Differently
- Learning Disabilities Association of America
- Learning Disabilities Association of New Hampshire
- Learning Disabilities Association of Illinois
- Learning Disabilities Association of New York State
- Learning Disabilities Association of South Carolina
- Learning Disabilities Association of Utah
- Learning Disabilities Association of Virginia
- Learning Disabilities Association of Wisconsin
- Learning Disabilities Association of Ohio
- Learning Disabilities Association of Texas
- National Stewardship Action Council
- National Toxic Encephalopathy Foundation
- Natural Resources Defense Council
- Physicians for Social Responsibility San Francisco
- PODER (Pueblo Organizado en Defensa de la tierra y sus Recursos)
- San Francisco Firefighters Cancer Prevention Foundation
- The Last Plastic Straw
- Northeast Organic Dairy Producers Alliance
Businesses :
- Brandgeek
- Innersense
- Mamavation
- Naturepedic
- W.S. Badger Company, Inc.
Press Releases
For more information, contact:
Nancy Buermeyer, Breast Cancer Prevention Partners, nancy@BCPP.org
Footnotes
[1] https://www.foodpackagingforum.org/news/fpf-publishes-food-contact-chemicals-database
[2] Trasande L, Shaffer RM, Sathyanarayana S. 2018. American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Council on Environmental Health. Food Additives and Child Health. Pediatrics. 2018 Aug;142(2). http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/pediatrics/142/2/e20181408.full.pdf
[3] Muncke, J., Andersson, AM., Backhaus, T. et al. Impacts of food contact chemicals on human health: a consensus statement. Environ Health 19, 25 (2020). https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-020-0572-5
[4] Muncke, J et al. 2017. Scientific Challenges in the Risk Assessment of Food Contact Materials. Environ Health Perspectives. 2017 Sep 11;125(9):095001. doi: 10.1289/EHP644. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28893723/
[5] https://www.foodpackagingforum.org/news/food-contact-chemicals-among-921-substances-tied-to-breast-cancer-risk
Kay, J et al. 2024. Application of the Key Characteristics Framework to Identify Potential Breast Carcinogens Using Publicly Available in Vivo, in Vitro, and in Silico Data. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2024, Jan 10; 132(1): 017002. doi: 10.1289/EHP13233 https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/EHP13233
Types: Article