Research Results
Beta Version
Use the search bar below to find studies, or apply one or more filters to narrow your results. See our list of keywords to guide your search.
Search by keyword
Select
Select
- All Risk Factors
- Air Pollution
- Alcohol
- Antimicrobials
- Artificial sweeteners
- Bisphenols
- Body Weight
- Breast Density
- Chemical Mixtures
- Chemicals in products
- Cleaning Products
- Diet
- Exercise
- Family History
- Furniture & Electronics
- Genetics
- Gut Health
- Hair Dye
- Hormones
- Inflammation
- Job
- Light at night
- Metals
- Neighborhood
- Night Shift Work
- Noise
- Non-stick Pans & Waterproof Gear
- Oral Contraceptives
- PAHs
- Parabens
- PCBs
- Personal Care Products
- Pesticides
- PFAS
- Pharmaceuticals
- Place-based
- Plastic
- Pregnancy & Breastfeeding
- Processed Food
- Puberty Age
- Race/Ethnicity
- Radiation
- Red meat
- Scented Products & Soft Plastic
- Sleeping Patterns
- Soda
- Stress
- Sugar
- Sunscreen
- Tobacco
- Vitamin D
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select the Chemical Agents
- All Chemical Agents
- 1,1,2,2-TCA
- 1,3-Butadiene
- Acrolein
- Aldrin
- Alkylphenols
- Antimicrobials
- Antimicrobials: QACs, Triclosan, Triclocarban
- Aromatic Amines
- Arsenic
- Artificial Sweeteners
- Atrazine
- Benzene
- Bisphenols
- Cadmium
- Chlordane
- Chlorpyrifos
- DDT
- Dibutyl Phthalate
- Dichlorvos
- Dieldrin
- Dioxins
- ell/
- Ethanol (alcohol)
- Ethyl Benzene
- Ethylene Oxide
- Flame Retardants
- Food
- Formaldehyde
- Glyphosate
- Heptachlor
- Hormones
- Insulin
- Lead
- Light at Night
- Mercury
- Metals
- Methoxyclor
- Naphthalene
- Night Shift Work
- Nitrogen Dioxide
- Noise
- Oral Contraceptives
- Organochlorine Pesticides
- Organophosphate Pesticides
- Ozone
- PAHs
- Parabens
- Particulate Matter
- PCBs
- Pesticides
- PFAS
- Phenols
- Phthalates
- Processed Food
- PVC
- Radiation: Ionizing
- Radiation: Non-Ionizing
- Soda
- Stress
- Sugar
- Tobacco
- Toluene
- Trichloroethylene
- Triclosan
- Ultraviolet Radiation
- UV Filters
- Vinyl Chloride
Select the Study Tags
Sort By
- Relevance
- Title (A to Z)
- Title (Z to A)
- Publication Year (Ascending)
- Publication Year (Descending)
- Authors (A to Z)
- Authors (Z to A)
2023
Environ Pollut
A study analyzing breast milk from 50 U.S. mothers ten years after the PBDE phaseout detected 25 brominated flame retardants including 9 PBDEs (found in 100% of samples), 8 bromophenols (88% of samples), and 8 other BFRs, with PBDE concentrations showing a significant 70% decline since 2002 (median 15.0 ng/g lipid, halving time 12.2 years) but bromophenols and replacement flame retardants reaching concentrations up to 71.1 and 278 ng/g lipid respectively. This represents the first measurement of bromophenols and replacement flame retardants in U.S. breast milk, revealing that while legacy PBDE levels have declined substantially following regulatory action, current-use flame retardants are now contaminating breast milk at concerning levels. The persistent presence of phased-out PBDEs alongside emerging bromophenols and replacement BFRs—many of which are persistent, toxic, and bioaccumulative—indicates ongoing prenatal exposure through breastfeeding and increased risk for adverse impacts on infant neurodevelopment; however, it’s important to note that breastfeeding remains recommended and is still considered safer and more beneficial than formula feeding despite the presence of these contaminants, highlighting the urgent need for policies to reduce flame retardant contamination at the source rather than discouraging breastfeeding.
2023
Reprod Toxicol
A review of epidemiologic literature examining environmental chemical exposures during pregnancy and three maternal health outcomes (preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and breast cancer) found that pregnancy represents a unique critical period when biological changes can heighten women’s susceptibility to chemicals from air, food, water, and consumer products—including flame retardants, plasticizers, pesticides, and lead—though research has disproportionately focused on fetal outcomes rather than maternal health risks, which remain poorly characterized for most chemicals. While evidence shows that lead exposure increases risk of pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders and pregnancy can amplify women’s vulnerability to environmental chemicals, variations in study design, exposure assessment methods, and inconsistent adjustment for confounders limited comparability across studies. The authors emphasize that future research must recognize pregnancy as a critical window for women’s lifelong health, calling for incorporation of biomarkers of exposure and effect, deliberate timing and methods of measurement, and consistent confounder adjustment to strengthen understanding of the pregnancy exposome and its impacts on maternal health outcomes beyond the immediate postpartum period.
2022
Biomed Pharmacother
A review of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs)—ubiquitous substances found in cosmetics, plastic food packaging, and medicines that enter the body through skin, digestive, or respiratory routes—examined their toxic effects even at microgram doses on the female reproductive system and genetic mechanisms. EDCs disrupt endocrine functions by binding to steroid hormone receptors, interfering with hormone synthesis and secretion, and modulating epigenetic processes that can lead to gene expression disturbances, contributing to neoplastic diseases, neurological disorders, circulatory problems, and reproductive dysfunction. Prenatal exposure can affect offspring development, with particular impacts on ovarian function leading to reduced fertility through disturbances in steroid receptor function, steroidogenesis, and gametogenesis. The review emphasizes that despite widespread exposure to these chemicals in everyday products, continued research is needed to fully understand their effects on the female reproductive system and potential transgenerational impacts mediated through epigenetic mechanisms.
2021
Int J Environ Res Pubilc Health
A case-control study of 494 breast cancer cases and 515 healthy controls in Poland’s Lodz region (2015-2019) found that night shift work was the third most important breast cancer risk factor after high BMI and short/no breastfeeding, ranking before early menstruation, late menopause, nulliparity, and smoking. Night work increased breast cancer risk 2.34-fold, with high-intensity night work showing an even greater 2.66-fold increase, and the harmful effects were influenced by intensity, frequency, rotation patterns, and cumulative years of night shift exposure. The findings support the IARC’s 2019 classification of night shift work as probably carcinogenic (Group 2A) and emphasize the need for ergonomic recommendations to minimize breast cancer risk among night shift workers through optimized scheduling practices.
2021
Cancers
A meta-analysis of 42 case-control studies published 2009-2020 including 110,580 women (30,778 breast cancer cases, 79,802 controls) from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases examined the association between oral contraceptive (OC) use and breast cancer risk. OC use was associated with a significantly increased breast cancer risk (OR=1.15; 95% CI: 1.01-1.31; p=0.0358), with additional significant risk factors including early menarche, nulliparity, non-breastfeeding, older age at first birth, postmenopause, obesity, smoking, and family history of breast cancer. Despite this meta-analysis and extensive previous studies supporting the conclusion that oral contraceptive pills modestly increase breast cancer risk by approximately 15%, the relatively small effect size, heterogeneity across studies, and authors’ call for further confirmation indicate that the relationship between contemporary OC formulations and breast cancer requires continued investigation, particularly regarding dose-response relationships, specific formulation types, and timing of exposure relative to reproductive events.
2020
Nutrients
A prospective cohort study of 10,930 Spanish female university graduates in the SUN (“Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra”) project examined whether adherence to the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) cancer prevention recommendations was associated with breast cancer risk. The study used an 8-item score measuring compliance with recommendations including body fat, physical activity, consumption of wholegrains/vegetables/fruit/beans, avoidance of fast foods and processed meats, limited sugar-sweetened drinks and alcohol, and breastfeeding. While no significant association was found for overall breast cancer risk, women who scored highest on adherence (>5 points vs. ≤3 points) had a 73% reduced risk of postmenopausal breast cancer after adjusting for other variables. The findings suggest that following multiple WCRF/AICR lifestyle and nutritional recommendations together may significantly reduce postmenopausal breast cancer risk through their combined protective effects.
2020
Cells
A comprehensive review reveals that imbalanced gut and body microbiomes are linked to nearly all established breast cancer risk factors—including obesity, aging, periodontal disease, alcohol intake, reproductive history, and elevated estrogen levels—suggesting that microbial dysbiosis may itself be an important independent risk factor. The altered bacteria can promote cancer through multiple mechanisms: producing harmful metabolic byproducts, changing how the body processes medications and environmental chemicals, disrupting immune system function, and affecting how well cancer treatments work. These findings suggest that maintaining a healthy microbiome through diet, lifestyle, or therapeutic interventions could potentially reduce breast cancer risk and improve treatment outcomes, representing a promising new frontier in breast cancer prevention and management.
2019
Arch Med Res
A case-control study of 101 incident breast cancer cases and 101 matched controls at the Instituto de Seguridad Social del Estado de México y Municipios found that women who worked night shifts had 8.58-fold higher odds of breast cancer compared to those who never worked nights (OR=8.58; 95% CI: 2.19-33.8), while breastfeeding was protective (OR=0.12; 95% CI: 0.02-0.60) and early menarche ≤12 years increased risk (OR=18.58; 95% CI: 2.19-148). Despite the small sample size yielding wide confidence intervals, these findings from Mexican women are consistent with studies from other countries positively associating night shift work with breast cancer risk. The results support the hypothesis that night shift work involving circadian disruption increases breast cancer risk, though the large effect size and wide confidence intervals suggest the need for larger studies with more precise estimates to confirm these associations in Mexican populations.