Research Results

Beta Version

Use the search bar below to find studies, or apply one or more filters to narrow your results. See our list of keywords to guide your search.

Search by keyword

Try these: air pollutionalcoholbisphenolshormonespersonal care productspesticidesplastic

Filter by Risk Factors
Filter by Protective Factors
Filter by Exposure Sources
Filter by Chemical Classes

Sort By

  • Relevance
  • Title (A to Z)
  • Title (Z to A)
  • Publication Year (Ascending)
  • Publication Year (Descending)
  • Authors (A to Z)
  • Authors (Z to A)

High adherence to Western dietary pattern increases breast cancer risk (an EPIC-Spain study).

Castelló et al,

2024

Maturitas

A prospective study of 24,892 Spanish women (639 breast cancer cases) from the EPIC cohort examined associations between three dietary patterns (Western, Prudent, Mediterranean) and breast cancer risk over time. Women with moderate-to-high adherence to the Western dietary pattern showed a non-linear 37% increased breast cancer risk compared to those with lowest adherence (HR = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.07-1.77 for third quartile and HR = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.03-1.83 for fourth quartile), with particularly strong associations in postmenopausal women (HR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.04-1.94 in highest quartile) and for ER+/PR+/HER2- tumors (HR = 1.71; 95% CI: 1.11-2.63 in highest quartile), while Prudent and Mediterranean patterns showed no clear associations. The findings suggest that Western dietary patterns characterized by high-fat dairy, red and processed meats, refined grains, sweets, caloric drinks, and convenience foods may increase breast cancer risk, especially for hormone receptor-positive tumors in postmenopausal women.

Dietary Inflammatory Index and risk of breast cancer: evidence from a prospective cohort of 67,879 women followed for 20 years in France.

Hajji-Louati et al,

2023

Eur J Nutr

A large prospective cohort study of 67,879 French women followed for 21 years found that higher dietary inflammatory potential was associated with a 4% increased breast cancer risk per standard deviation increase in DII score, with women in the highest versus lowest quintile showing a 13% increased risk in a linear dose-response relationship. The association was slightly stronger among non-smokers (6% increased risk per standard deviation) and low alcohol consumers (5% increased risk per standard deviation), suggesting that inflammatory diet effects may be most pronounced in women without other pro-inflammatory exposures. These findings from one of the largest and longest prospective studies provide strong evidence that promoting anti-inflammatory dietary patterns—rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, nuts, and fish while limiting processed foods, red meat, refined carbohydrates, and saturated fats—could contribute meaningfully to breast cancer prevention as part of comprehensive public health strategies.

Association of Empirically Derived Food-Based Inflammatory Potential of the Diet and Breast Cancer: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study.

Ghanbari et al,

2022

Clin Breast Cancer

A case-control study of 150 Iranian women with newly diagnosed breast cancer matched with 150 controls found that women consuming the most pro-inflammatory diets (highest quartile of food-based dietary inflammatory index) had a 138% increased breast cancer risk compared to those with the least inflammatory diets, with the association remaining significant (180% increased risk) after adjusting for confounding factors. The food-based empirical dietary inflammatory index (FDII), which scores dietary patterns based on 27 pre-defined food groups according to their inflammatory potential, showed a clear dose-response relationship with breast cancer risk across quartiles. These findings from a Middle Eastern population reinforce that dietary patterns promoting systemic inflammation substantially increase breast cancer risk, and suggest that practical, food-based dietary modifications—emphasizing anti-inflammatory whole foods like fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, nuts, and fish while limiting pro-inflammatory processed foods, red meat, and refined carbohydrates—could be an effective and culturally adaptable breast cancer prevention strategy.

Inflammatory potential of the diet and risk of breast cancer in the European Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study.

Castro-Espin et al,

2021

Eur J Epidemiol

A large prospective study of 318,686 European women followed for 14 years found that consuming a pro-inflammatory diet was associated with a 4% increased breast cancer risk per standard deviation increase in inflammatory diet score, with women in the most pro-inflammatory diet group showing a 12% increased risk compared to those consuming the least inflammatory diets. The association was particularly strong in premenopausal women (8% increased risk per standard deviation), and notably, the pro-inflammatory diet effect was independent of body mass index, physical activity, and alcohol consumption, suggesting that dietary inflammation contributes to breast cancer risk through pathways distinct from these other established risk factors. The consistent associations across all hormone receptor-defined breast cancer subtypes suggest that dietary inflammation may promote breast cancer through non-hormonal mechanisms, reinforcing the importance of anti-inflammatory dietary patterns—rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and omega-3 fatty acids while limiting processed foods, red meat, and refined carbohydrates—as a modifiable strategy for breast cancer prevention across all women, particularly those still premenopausal.

Association between meat consumption and risk of breast cancer: Findings from the Sister Study.

Lo et al,

2020

Int J Cancer

A prospective study of 42,012 women in the Sister Study followed participants for an average of 7.6 years and identified 1,536 invasive breast cancer cases to examine the association between meat consumption types and breast cancer risk. The study found that higher red meat consumption was associated with a 23% increased risk of invasive breast cancer (highest vs. lowest quartile), and when total meat consumption was held constant in a substitution model, replacing red meat with poultry reduced breast cancer risk by 28%. No associations were found between cooking practices, heterocyclic amines (carcinogens formed during high-temperature cooking), or heme iron from red meat and breast cancer risk, suggesting the red meat-breast cancer link may operate through other mechanisms. The findings suggest that women could potentially reduce their breast cancer risk by replacing red meat with poultry in their diets, though the biological mechanisms underlying this association require further investigation.

Adherence to the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Recommendations and Breast Cancer in the SUN Project.

Barrios-Rodríguez et al,

2020

Nutrients

A prospective cohort study of 10,930 Spanish female university graduates in the SUN (“Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra”) project examined whether adherence to the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) cancer prevention recommendations was associated with breast cancer risk. The study used an 8-item score measuring compliance with recommendations including body fat, physical activity, consumption of wholegrains/vegetables/fruit/beans, avoidance of fast foods and processed meats, limited sugar-sweetened drinks and alcohol, and breastfeeding. While no significant association was found for overall breast cancer risk, women who scored highest on adherence (>5 points vs. ≤3 points) had a 73% reduced risk of postmenopausal breast cancer after adjusting for other variables. The findings suggest that following multiple WCRF/AICR lifestyle and nutritional recommendations together may significantly reduce postmenopausal breast cancer risk through their combined protective effects.

Meat intake, methods and degrees of cooking and breast cancer risk in the MCC-Spain study.

Boldo et al,

2018

Maturitas

A Spanish population-based case-control study of 1,006 breast cancer cases and 1,370 controls found that high total meat intake was associated with a 39% increased breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women, with processed/cured meat showing a 47% increased risk overall and a striking 152% increased risk specifically for triple-negative breast cancers. Cooking methods and doneness preferences significantly modified risk: well-done red meat was associated with 62% increased risk and stewed red meat with 49% increased risk (particularly for hormone receptor-positive tumors), while pan-fried or breaded white meat showed 38% increased overall risk and 78% increased risk in premenopausal women. These findings suggest that breast cancer risk could be reduced not only by limiting meat consumption—especially processed meats—but also by modifying cooking practices to avoid well-done or high-temperature cooking methods that generate carcinogenic compounds like heterocyclic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Dietary Inflammatory Index and Odds of Breast Cancer in a Case-Control Study from Iran.

Jalali et al,

2018

Nutr Cancer

A case-control study of 136 breast cancer patients and 272 controls in Iran found that women consuming the most pro-inflammatory diets (highest quartile of DII scores) had a 164% increased breast cancer risk compared to those with the least inflammatory diets, with the association particularly striking among premenopausal women who showed a 451% increased risk. No association was detected in postmenopausal women, contrasting with findings from other studies that have typically shown stronger effects in postmenopausal populations. These findings suggest that pro-inflammatory dietary patterns may be especially harmful during premenopausal years when breast tissue is more metabolically active and hormone-responsive, highlighting the potential importance of anti-inflammatory dietary interventions—emphasizing whole grains, fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts, and fish while limiting processed foods, red meat, and refined carbohydrates—as a targeted prevention strategy for younger women at risk of breast cancer.

Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk among Iranian women: A case-control study.

Heidari et al,

2018

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Repod Biol

A hospital-based case-control study of 134 breast cancer cases and 267 controls in Tehran, Iran used a 168-item food frequency questionnaire and factor analysis to identify two major dietary patterns and assess their association with breast cancer risk. The “healthy” pattern (high in fruits, vegetables, seeds, legumes, fish, whole grains, and liquid/olive oils, with low salt) showed no significant association with breast cancer (OR: 0.83), while the “unhealthy” pattern (high in sweets, soft drinks, mayonnaise, solid oils, processed meat, fried/boiled potatoes, and salt) was associated with significantly increased breast cancer risk in the highest versus lowest quartile (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.04-4.69). When stratified by menopausal status, the unhealthy dietary pattern showed a particularly strong association with breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women (OR: 3.56; 95% CI: 1.16-10.95), but not premenopausal women. These findings suggest that overall dietary patterns—rather than individual nutrients or foods—may be important determinants of breast cancer risk, with an unhealthy Western-style diet pattern characterized by processed foods, added sugars, unhealthy fats, and high salt intake potentially more than doubling breast cancer risk, especially in postmenopausal Iranian women.

Risk of cancer in regular and low meat-eaters, fish-eaters, and vegetarians: a prospective analysis of UK Biobank participants.

Watling et al,

2022

BMC Med

A large UK study of 472,377 people followed for over 11 years found that vegetarians had 14% lower overall cancer risk compared to regular meat-eaters, with similar reductions seen in low meat-eaters (2% lower) and fish-eaters (10% lower). Vegetarian postmenopausal women had 18% lower breast cancer risk, though this benefit appeared to be largely explained by vegetarians having lower body weight, while men who ate fish or followed vegetarian diets had 20-31% lower prostate cancer risk. Low meat consumption was associated with 9% lower colorectal cancer risk, particularly in men, supporting previous evidence that meat intake increases cancer risk, though the study couldn’t definitively determine whether the observed benefits reflect direct dietary effects or other lifestyle factors associated with these eating patterns.

Red and processed meat consumption and cancer outcomes: Umbrella review.

Huang et al,

2021

Food Chem

An umbrella review analyzing 72 meta-analyses found that red meat consumption was associated with increased risk of 10 different cancer types (including breast cancer), while processed meat was linked to 11 cancer types, with both showing consistent dose-dependent increases in risk. Specifically, eating an additional 100 grams of red meat daily (about 3.5 ounces) was associated with 11-51% higher cancer risk, while an extra 50 grams of processed meat daily (equivalent to about 1-2 slices of deli meat or one hot dog) increased cancer risk by 8-72% depending on cancer type. The evidence showed no cancer risk level at which red or processed meat consumption was beneficial, suggesting that reducing intake of these meats could be an important dietary strategy for cancer prevention, including breast cancer.

No results found.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Share This