Research Results
Beta Version
Use the search bar below to find studies, or apply one or more filters to narrow your results. See our list of keywords to guide your search.
Search by keyword
Select
Select
- All Risk Factors
- Air Pollution
- Alcohol
- Antimicrobials
- Artificial sweeteners
- Bisphenols
- Body Weight
- Breast Density
- Chemical Mixtures
- Chemicals in products
- Cleaning Products
- Diet
- Exercise
- Family History
- Furniture & Electronics
- Genetics
- Gut Health
- Hair Dye
- Hormones
- Inflammation
- Job
- Light at night
- Metals
- Neighborhood
- Night Shift Work
- Noise
- Non-stick Pans & Waterproof Gear
- Oral Contraceptives
- PAHs
- Parabens
- PCBs
- Personal Care Products
- Pesticides
- PFAS
- Pharmaceuticals
- Place-based
- Plastic
- Pregnancy & Breastfeeding
- Processed Food
- Puberty Age
- Race/Ethnicity
- Radiation
- Red meat
- Scented Products & Soft Plastic
- Sleeping Patterns
- Soda
- Stress
- Sugar
- Sunscreen
- Tobacco
- Vitamin D
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select the Chemical Agents
- All Chemical Agents
- 1,1,2,2-TCA
- 1,3-Butadiene
- Acrolein
- Aldrin
- Alkylphenols
- Antimicrobials
- Antimicrobials: QACs, Triclosan, Triclocarban
- Aromatic Amines
- Arsenic
- Artificial Sweeteners
- Atrazine
- Benzene
- Bisphenols
- Cadmium
- Chlordane
- Chlorpyrifos
- DDT
- Dibutyl Phthalate
- Dichlorvos
- Dieldrin
- Dioxins
- ell/
- Ethanol (alcohol)
- Ethyl Benzene
- Ethylene Oxide
- Flame Retardants
- Food
- Formaldehyde
- Glyphosate
- Heptachlor
- Hormones
- Insulin
- Lead
- Light at Night
- Mercury
- Metals
- Methoxyclor
- Naphthalene
- Night Shift Work
- Nitrogen Dioxide
- Noise
- Oral Contraceptives
- Organochlorine Pesticides
- Organophosphate Pesticides
- Ozone
- PAHs
- Parabens
- Particulate Matter
- PCBs
- Pesticides
- PFAS
- Phenols
- Phthalates
- Processed Food
- PVC
- Radiation: Ionizing
- Radiation: Non-Ionizing
- Soda
- Stress
- Sugar
- Tobacco
- Toluene
- Trichloroethylene
- Triclosan
- Ultraviolet Radiation
- UV Filters
- Vinyl Chloride
Select the Study Tags
Sort By
- Relevance
- Title (A to Z)
- Title (Z to A)
- Publication Year (Ascending)
- Publication Year (Descending)
- Authors (A to Z)
- Authors (Z to A)
2022
Environ Int
A study of 48,450 women followed for over 10 years found that higher residential UV radiation exposure was associated with a 27% reduced risk of estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) breast cancer, but showed no association with overall breast cancer risk or ER-positive breast cancer. The protective effect against ER- breast cancer was particularly strong (48% risk reduction) among women who did not regularly take Vitamin D supplements, while those taking supplements showed no benefit from UV exposure. These findings suggest that UV-induced Vitamin D production may specifically protect against ER- breast cancer, a particularly aggressive subtype, supporting the importance of adequate Vitamin D levels through natural sunlight exposure or supplementation.
2023
Endocrine
A case-control study in North India found that breast cancer patients had significantly lower serum Vitamin D levels than healthy controls, with women in the highest Vitamin D quartile having 59% lower breast cancer risk than those in the lowest quartile (OR = 2.44; 95% CI: 1.09-5.45); additionally, women with the polymorphic T allele for VDR FokI genotype (CT/TT) had over 4-fold increased breast cancer risk compared to those homozygous for the wild C allele (OR = 4.30; 95% CI: 2.21-8.35). Vitamin D levels were significantly higher in ER+ patients and significantly lower in advanced-stage cancers, suggesting Vitamin D may serve as both a risk factor and prognostic marker. The study concludes that FokI polymorphism of the VDR gene and low circulating Vitamin D levels independently increase breast cancer risk in North Indian women.
Low Vitamin D level increases women’s breast cancer risks, Sulaimaniyah, Iraq: A case-control study.
2023
Cell Mol Biol
A case-control study of 130 women (65 breast cancer patients, 65 healthy controls) aged 20-60 at Shar Hospital in Sulaimaniyah, Iraq found that 66.1% of breast cancer patients had vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/L) compared to 43.1% of controls, with significantly lower mean vitamin D levels in cases (17.8±8.6) versus controls (20.2±8.7), and vitamin D levels below 20 ng/L associated with 2.59-fold increased breast cancer risk (OR=2.59; 95% CI: 1.24-5.38). After adjusting for age and BMI, vitamin D insufficiency remained a significant breast cancer risk factor (AOR=2.30; 95% CI: 1.1-4.86 for patients; AOR=3.67; 95% CI: 1.55-8.7 for controls). These findings indicate that vitamin D insufficiency substantially increases breast cancer risk among Iraqi women, supporting the role of vitamin D in breast cancer prevention and highlighting the importance of maintaining adequate vitamin D levels, particularly in populations with high deficiency rates.
2023
Gut Microbes
A mouse study revealed that Vitamin D receptor (VDR) deficiency in the gut lining leads to bacterial imbalance (dysbiosis), increased intestinal permeability (“leaky gut”), and bacterial migration to breast tissue, significantly increasing breast tumor formation. Mice lacking intestinal VDR developed larger and more numerous breast tumors, with harmful bacteria like Streptococcus found in the tumor tissue, while beneficial bacteria that normally protect against cancer were depleted. However, treatment with butyrate (a beneficial bacterial byproduct) or the probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum reduced breast tumors by restoring gut barrier function and reducing inflammation, demonstrating a direct gut-breast axis. These findings suggest that maintaining gut health through adequate Vitamin D, beneficial bacteria, and a healthy microbiome may be a promising strategy for breast cancer prevention, though human studies are needed to confirm these results.
2022
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev
A matched case-control study of 187 breast cancer patients and 187 controls in Asia found that irregular sleep patterns and severe stress were the strongest modifiable risk factors, with irregular sleep associated with a staggering 3,311% increased breast cancer risk and severe stress showing a 574% increased risk. Poor sleep quality showed an even more dramatic 1,029% increased risk, while regular multivitamin use was associated with a 238% increased risk—a surprising finding requiring further investigation—and having a first child before age 30 was protective with a 56% risk reduction. Notably, none of the traditional non-modifiable risk factors (such as family history) showed significant associations in this study, suggesting that modifiable lifestyle factors—particularly sleep quality and stress management—may be critically important targets for breast cancer prevention in Asian populations experiencing rapidly rising breast cancer rates.
2021
Ocup Environ Med
A large Danish registry-based case-control study of 38,375 women under age 70 with primary breast cancer and matched controls used objective lifetime employment histories from the Danish Supplementary Pension Fund Register and a job exposure matrix to assess occupational ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure as a reliable measure of long-term solar UVR exposure. While no overall association was observed between occupational UVR exposure and breast cancer risk, among women aged ≥50 years, longer duration of UVR exposure (≥20 years: OR=0.83; 95% CI: 0.75-0.92) and highest cumulative exposure (OR=0.89; 95% CI: 0.83-0.95) were inversely associated with breast cancer risk, with no notable differences by estrogen receptor status. These findings suggest that long-term occupational UVR exposure may protect against late-onset breast cancer, supporting the hypothesis that solar UVR (likely through vitamin D production) may have protective effects on breast cancer development, particularly in postmenopausal women, though the mechanism requires further investigation in future occupational studies with objective exposure assessment.
2020
PLOS One
A matched case-control study in Karachi, Pakistan examined 411 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer and 784 cancer-free controls to investigate the relationship between Vitamin D levels, supplementation, sun exposure, and breast cancer risk in a population where both Vitamin D deficiency and breast cancer are prevalent. The study found that women with Vitamin D deficiency (serum levels <20 ng/ml) had a 65% increased risk of breast cancer compared to those with sufficient levels (>30 ng/ml), while women who took Vitamin D supplements in the year prior had a 68% reduced risk of breast cancer. The researchers conclude that Vitamin D deficiency is associated with increased breast cancer risk in Pakistani women, and suggest that maintaining adequate Vitamin D levels through supplementation could be a safe, affordable prevention strategy. This approach may be particularly beneficial for reducing breast cancer incidence and mortality among economically disadvantaged women in Pakistan who face barriers to early detection and treatment, though further research is needed to confirm these findings.
2020
Env Health Persp
A systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 studies found that spending one or more hours per day in the sun during summer months was associated with a 16% reduced breast cancer risk compared to less than one hour daily, with similar protective effects observed for both 1-2 hours and more than 2 hours of sun exposure. Sun exposure during adolescence appeared particularly protective (17% risk reduction), while exposure after age 45 showed no significant benefit, and interestingly, ambient UV radiation levels alone were not associated with breast cancer risk. These findings suggest that active sun exposure—likely through Vitamin D production—may offer modest breast cancer protection when obtained regularly during youth and early adulthood, though the results should be balanced against known skin cancer risks from excessive UV exposure.
2020
Medicine
A meta-analysis of 6 studies found that exposure to solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation was associated with a 30% reduced breast cancer risk overall, with a dose-response analysis showing a linear protective relationship in women over 40 (14% risk reduction per unit increase in UV exposure). Notably, not tanning and covering the limbs were associated with increased breast cancer risk, while sunscreen use showed no association with risk, suggesting that actual UV skin exposure—rather than ambient UV levels alone—may be the key protective factor. This is the first dose-response meta-analysis demonstrating that higher UV exposure correlates with lower breast cancer risk in a linear fashion among middle-aged and older women, likely through Vitamin D production, though the findings highlight the complex balance between skin cancer risks from excessive UV exposure versus potential breast cancer protection from adequate sun exposure, and the need for further research on how factors like estrogen receptor status, Occupation, and ethnicity modify this relationship.