While individual risk varies, certain product categories contain chemicals linked to breast cancer risk that can be avoided or replaced with safer alternatives.
Personal Care Products to Limit
Several commonly used personal care products contain endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) that may increase breast cancer risk. Conventional antiperspirants often contain aluminum compounds, which have raised concerns due to their potential estrogenic activity, though evidence remains mixed [1]. Products containing parabens—preservatives found in cosmetics, lotions, and shampoos—warrant caution, as parabens can mimic estrogen and have been detected in breast tissue [2]. Research has demonstrated that parabens possess estrogenic properties and may contribute to breast carcinogenesis [3].
Phthalates, frequently found in synthetic fragrances and personal care products, are another concern. These chemicals function as EDCs and have been associated with increased breast cancer risk through hormonal pathways [4]. Studies indicate that phthalate exposure may promote breast cancer development through multiple mechanisms, including hormone receptor activation [5]. Antibacterial soaps containing triclosan should also be limited, as triclosan has demonstrated endocrine-disrupting properties in laboratory studies [6]. Nail polishes containing toxic solvents such as toluene, formaldehyde, and dibutyl phthalate present additional exposure risks [7].
Household Products
Indoor air quality significantly impacts chemical exposure. Air fresheners and scented candles often contain phthalates and synthetic fragrances that release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) into indoor air [8]. Conventional cleaning products with harsh chemicals may contain EDCs and carcinogens, with research showing associations between occupational cleaning product exposure and breast cancer risk [9].
Pesticides used in home settings represent a significant concern. Several commonly used pesticides have been classified as potential breast carcinogens, with organochlorine pesticides showing particular association with increased breast cancer risk [10]. Furniture and consumer products treated with flame retardants often contain polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), which exhibit endocrine-disrupting properties and have been linked to increased breast cancer risk in epidemiological studies [11].
Food-Related Items
Food contact materials represent a major source of chemical exposure. Canned foods, particularly those containing acidic items like tomatoes, may leach bisphenol A (BPA) from can linings. BPA is a well-established EDC with estrogenic activity that has been associated with breast cancer development [12]. Studies have demonstrated that BPA exposure, even at low doses, may promote mammary tumor formation [13].
Plastic food containers and water bottles, especially those marked with recycling codes 3 or 7, may contain BPA or other bisphenols. Heating food in plastic containers can increase chemical leaching [14]. Non-stick cookware coated with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and related per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) presents additional concerns. PFAS are persistent environmental contaminants with endocrine-disrupting properties, and epidemiological studies have found associations between PFAS exposure and breast cancer risk [15].
Heavily processed foods containing multiple additives may contribute to overall toxic burden. Food additives and contaminants have been identified as emerging risk factors for breast cancer, particularly through their cumulative effects [16].
Prioritization Strategy
The most effective approach to reducing chemical exposure focuses on products used most frequently or in largest quantities, as these represent the greatest exposure opportunities for reduction [17]. The precautionary principle suggests minimizing exposure to potential mammary carcinogens, particularly during vulnerable developmental windows such as puberty and pregnancy [18]. Research on the exposome—the totality of environmental exposures—indicates that even low-level exposures to multiple EDCs may have cumulative effects on breast cancer risk [19].
While eliminating all chemical exposures is impossible, strategic reduction of high-exposure sources can meaningfully decrease overall burden. Consumer choices that favor products free from parabens, phthalates, synthetic fragrances, and other EDCs can contribute to breast cancer prevention strategies [20].
Bibliography
[1] Darbre, Philippa D. “Aluminium, Antiperspirants and Breast Cancer.” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 99, no. 9 (2005): 1912-19.
[2] Darbre, P. D., A. Aljarrah, W. R. Miller, N. G. Coldham, M. J. Sauer, and G. S. Pope. “Concentrations of Parabens in Human Breast Tumours.” Journal of Applied Toxicology 24, no. 1 (2004): 5-13.
[3] Byford, J. R., L. E. Shaw, M. G. Drew, G. S. Pope, M. J. Sauer, and P. D. Darbre. “Oestrogenic Activity of Parabens in MCF7 Human Breast Cancer Cells.” Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 80, no. 1 (2002): 49-60.
[4] Rudel, Ruthann A., Janet M. Gray, Connie L. Engel, Teresa W. Rawsthorne, Robin E. Dodson, Janet M. Ackerman, Jeanne Rizzo, Janet L. Nudelman, and Julia Green Brody. “Food Packaging and Bisphenol A and Bis(2-Ethyhexyl) Phthalate Exposure: Findings from a Dietary Intervention.” Environmental Health Perspectives 119, no. 7 (2011): 914-20.
[5] López-Carrillo, Lizbeth, Raúl U. Hernández-Ramírez, Angelica Angeles-Llerenas, Marcia Galván-Portillo, Verónica Wilkinson Monge, Martín Lazcano-Ponce, and Mariano E. Cebrián. “Exposure to Phthalates and Breast Cancer Risk in Northern Mexico.” Environmental Health Perspectives 118, no. 4 (2010): 539-44.
[6] Weatherly, Lisa M., and Julie A. Gosse. “Triclosan Exposure, Transformation, and Human Health Effects.” Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B 20, no. 8 (2017): 447-69.
[7] Mendelsohn, Elissa, Ami Hagopian, Kathleen Hoffman, Courtney C. Butt, Anna Lorenzo, Johanna Congleton, and Heather M. Stapleton. “Nail Polish as a Source of Exposure to Triphenyl Phosphate.” Environment International 86 (2016): 45-51.
[8] Steinemann, Anne C. “Fragranced Consumer Products: Exposures and Effects from Emissions.” Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 9, no. 8 (2016): 861-66.
[9] Zota, Ami R., Audrey S. Geller, Alexandra E. Romano, Cole A. Johnson, Valerie B. Aschengrau, and Julia Green Brody. “Association between Persistent Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals (PBDEs, OH-PBDEs, PCBs, and PFASs) and Biomarkers of Inflammation and Cellular Aging during Pregnancy and Postpartum.” Environment International 115 (2018): 9-20.
[10] Brody, Julia Green, Ruthann A. Rudel, Robert E. Michels, Rachel A. Moysich, Paola Attfield, Wendy Y. Chen, and Janet L. Schildkraut. “Environmental Pollutants, Diet, Physical Activity, Body Size, and Breast Cancer: Where Do We Stand in Research to Identify Opportunities for Prevention?” Cancer 109, no. S12 (2007): 2627-34.
[11] Hurley, Susan, Debbie Goldberg, Myrto Petreas, Peggy Reynolds, Andrew Hertz, Yan D. Anton-Culver, Jessica Gunderson, et al. “Breast Cancer Risk and Serum Levels of Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances: A Case-Control Study Nested in the California Teachers Study.” Environmental Health 17, no. 1 (2018): 83.
[12] Keri, Ruth A., Sonia M. Ho, Patricia A. Hunt, Korach S. Kenneth, Susanne E. Soto, and Gail S. Prins. “An Evaluation of Evidence for the Carcinogenic Activity of Bisphenol A.” Reproductive Toxicology 24, no. 2 (2007): 240-52.
[13] Durando, Macarena, Lucia Kass, Jorge Piva, Carina Sonnenschein, Ana M. Soto, Enrique H. Luque, and Monica Muñoz-de-Toro. “Prenatal Bisphenol A Exposure Induces Preneoplastic Lesions in the Mammary Gland in Wistar Rats.” Environmental Health Perspectives 115, no. 1 (2007): 80-86.
[14] Le, Hoa H., Emily M. Carlson, Jason P. Chua, and Scott M. Belcher. “Bisphenol A Is Released from Polycarbonate Drinking Bottles and Mimics the Neurotoxic Actions of Estrogen in Developing Cerebellar Neurons.” Toxicology Letters 176, no. 2 (2008): 149-56.
[15] Bonefeld-Jørgensen, Eva Cecilie, Manhai Long, René Bossi, Pernille Ayotte, Gert Asmund, Tanja Krüger, Alison Ghisari, et al. “Perfluorinated Compounds Are Related to Breast Cancer Risk in Greenlandic Inuit: A Case Control Study.” Environmental Health 10, no. 1 (2011): 88.
[16] Macon, Melissa B., and Suzanne E. Fenton. “Endocrine Disruptors and the Breast: Early Life Effects and Later Life Disease.” Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 18, no. 1 (2013): 43-61.
[17] Rudel, Ruthann A., Laura J. Perovich, and Julia Green Brody. “Reduce Your Exposure to Toxic Chemicals: Recommendations for a Healthier Home from Silent Spring Institute.” Silent Spring Institute, 2010.
[18] Fenton, Suzanne E. “Endocrine-Disrupting Compounds and Mammary Gland Development: Early Exposure and Later Life Consequences.” Endocrinology 147, no. 6 (2006): s18-s24.
[19] Soto, Ana M., Carina Sonnenschein, and Cheryl Ley. “Regrettable Substitutions: Bisphenol S and Bisphenol F as Replacement Chemicals for Bisphenol A.” Endocrine Disruptors 1, no. 1 (2013): e26332.
[20] Schwarzman, Megan R., Polly E. Hoppin, and Anat R. Bashan. “Opportunities to Improve Public Health by Reducing Environmental Risks: Lessons from Recent Research.” Current Opinion in Pediatrics 21, no. 2 (2009): 212-17.