Research Results
Beta Version
Use the search bar below to find studies, or apply one or more filters to narrow your results. See our list of keywords to guide your search.
Search by keyword
Select
Select
- All Risk Factors
- Air Pollution
- Alcohol
- Antimicrobials
- Artificial sweeteners
- Bisphenols
- Body Weight
- Breast Density
- Chemical Mixtures
- Chemicals in products
- Cleaning Products
- Diet
- Exercise
- Family History
- Furniture & Electronics
- Genetics
- Gut Health
- Hair Dye
- Hormones
- Inflammation
- Job
- Light at night
- Metals
- Neighborhood
- Night Shift Work
- Noise
- Non-stick Pans & Waterproof Gear
- Oral Contraceptives
- PAHs
- Parabens
- PCBs
- Personal Care Products
- Pesticides
- PFAS
- Pharmaceuticals
- Place-based
- Plastic
- Pregnancy & Breastfeeding
- Processed Food
- Puberty Age
- Race/Ethnicity
- Radiation
- Red meat
- Scented Products & Soft Plastic
- Sleeping Patterns
- Soda
- Stress
- Sugar
- Sunscreen
- Tobacco
- Vitamin D
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select the Chemical Agents
- All Chemical Agents
- 1,1,2,2-TCA
- 1,3-Butadiene
- Acrolein
- Aldrin
- Alkylphenols
- Antimicrobials
- Antimicrobials: QACs, Triclosan, Triclocarban
- Aromatic Amines
- Arsenic
- Artificial Sweeteners
- Atrazine
- Benzene
- Bisphenols
- Cadmium
- Chlordane
- Chlorpyrifos
- DDT
- Dibutyl Phthalate
- Dichlorvos
- Dieldrin
- Dioxins
- ell/
- Ethanol (alcohol)
- Ethyl Benzene
- Ethylene Oxide
- Flame Retardants
- Food
- Formaldehyde
- Glyphosate
- Heptachlor
- Hormones
- Insulin
- Lead
- Light at Night
- Mercury
- Metals
- Methoxyclor
- Naphthalene
- Night Shift Work
- Nitrogen Dioxide
- Noise
- Oral Contraceptives
- Organochlorine Pesticides
- Organophosphate Pesticides
- Ozone
- PAHs
- Parabens
- Particulate Matter
- PCBs
- Pesticides
- PFAS
- Phenols
- Phthalates
- Processed Food
- PVC
- Radiation: Ionizing
- Radiation: Non-Ionizing
- Soda
- Stress
- Sugar
- Tobacco
- Toluene
- Trichloroethylene
- Triclosan
- Ultraviolet Radiation
- UV Filters
- Vinyl Chloride
Select the Study Tags
Sort By
- Relevance
- Title (A to Z)
- Title (Z to A)
- Publication Year (Ascending)
- Publication Year (Descending)
- Authors (A to Z)
- Authors (Z to A)
2023
Environ Res
A nationwide U.S. study of nearly 45,000 women found clear geographic patterns in breast cancer rates, with lower risk in the South and Southeast and higher risk in the Northwest and parts of the Midwest and Northeast, even after accounting for personal risk factors like family history and reproductive factors. Environmental exposures—including air pollution (nitrogen dioxide and fine particles), light at night, greenspace, and neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage—explained 21% of the geographic variation in overall breast cancer and 63% of the variation specifically for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. These findings provide strong evidence that where you live matters for breast cancer risk, with environmental factors playing a substantial role, particularly for ER+ breast cancer, the most common subtype, suggesting that reducing environmental exposures like air pollution and light at night could be effective prevention strategies at the community level.
2022
Environ Int
A study of 48,450 women followed for over 10 years found that higher residential UV radiation exposure was associated with a 27% reduced risk of estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) breast cancer, but showed no association with overall breast cancer risk or ER-positive breast cancer. The protective effect against ER- breast cancer was particularly strong (48% risk reduction) among women who did not regularly take Vitamin D supplements, while those taking supplements showed no benefit from UV exposure. These findings suggest that UV-induced Vitamin D production may specifically protect against ER- breast cancer, a particularly aggressive subtype, supporting the importance of adequate Vitamin D levels through natural sunlight exposure or supplementation.
2021
Ocup Environ Med
A large Danish registry-based case-control study of 38,375 women under age 70 with primary breast cancer and matched controls used objective lifetime employment histories from the Danish Supplementary Pension Fund Register and a job exposure matrix to assess occupational ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure as a reliable measure of long-term solar UVR exposure. While no overall association was observed between occupational UVR exposure and breast cancer risk, among women aged ≥50 years, longer duration of UVR exposure (≥20 years: OR=0.83; 95% CI: 0.75-0.92) and highest cumulative exposure (OR=0.89; 95% CI: 0.83-0.95) were inversely associated with breast cancer risk, with no notable differences by estrogen receptor status. These findings suggest that long-term occupational UVR exposure may protect against late-onset breast cancer, supporting the hypothesis that solar UVR (likely through vitamin D production) may have protective effects on breast cancer development, particularly in postmenopausal women, though the mechanism requires further investigation in future occupational studies with objective exposure assessment.
2020
Medicine
A meta-analysis of 6 studies found that exposure to solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation was associated with a 30% reduced breast cancer risk overall, with a dose-response analysis showing a linear protective relationship in women over 40 (14% risk reduction per unit increase in UV exposure). Notably, not tanning and covering the limbs were associated with increased breast cancer risk, while sunscreen use showed no association with risk, suggesting that actual UV skin exposure—rather than ambient UV levels alone—may be the key protective factor. This is the first dose-response meta-analysis demonstrating that higher UV exposure correlates with lower breast cancer risk in a linear fashion among middle-aged and older women, likely through Vitamin D production, though the findings highlight the complex balance between skin cancer risks from excessive UV exposure versus potential breast cancer protection from adequate sun exposure, and the need for further research on how factors like estrogen receptor status, Occupation, and ethnicity modify this relationship.
2020
Env Health Persp
A systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 studies found that spending one or more hours per day in the sun during summer months was associated with a 16% reduced breast cancer risk compared to less than one hour daily, with similar protective effects observed for both 1-2 hours and more than 2 hours of sun exposure. Sun exposure during adolescence appeared particularly protective (17% risk reduction), while exposure after age 45 showed no significant benefit, and interestingly, ambient UV radiation levels alone were not associated with breast cancer risk. These findings suggest that active sun exposure—likely through Vitamin D production—may offer modest breast cancer protection when obtained regularly during youth and early adulthood, though the results should be balanced against known skin cancer risks from excessive UV exposure.