Research Results
Beta Version
Use the search bar below to find studies, or apply one or more filters to narrow your results. See our list of keywords to guide your search.
Search by keyword
Select
Select
- All Risk Factors
- Air Pollution
- Alcohol
- Antimicrobials
- Artificial sweeteners
- Bisphenols
- Body Weight
- Breast Density
- Chemical Mixtures
- Chemicals in products
- Cleaning Products
- Diet
- Exercise
- Family History
- Furniture & Electronics
- Genetics
- Gut Health
- Hair Dye
- Hormones
- Inflammation
- Job
- Light at night
- Metals
- Neighborhood
- Night Shift Work
- Noise
- Non-stick Pans & Waterproof Gear
- Oral Contraceptives
- PAHs
- Parabens
- PCBs
- Personal Care Products
- Pesticides
- PFAS
- Pharmaceuticals
- Place-based
- Plastic
- Pregnancy & Breastfeeding
- Processed Food
- Puberty Age
- Race/Ethnicity
- Radiation
- Red meat
- Scented Products & Soft Plastic
- Sleeping Patterns
- Soda
- Stress
- Sugar
- Sunscreen
- Tobacco
- Vitamin D
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select the Chemical Agents
- All Chemical Agents
- 1,1,2,2-TCA
- 1,3-Butadiene
- Acrolein
- Aldrin
- Alkylphenols
- Antimicrobials
- Antimicrobials: QACs, Triclosan, Triclocarban
- Aromatic Amines
- Arsenic
- Artificial Sweeteners
- Atrazine
- Benzene
- Bisphenols
- Cadmium
- Chlordane
- Chlorpyrifos
- DDT
- Dibutyl Phthalate
- Dichlorvos
- Dieldrin
- Dioxins
- ell/
- Ethanol (alcohol)
- Ethyl Benzene
- Ethylene Oxide
- Flame Retardants
- Food
- Formaldehyde
- Glyphosate
- Heptachlor
- Hormones
- Insulin
- Lead
- Light at Night
- Mercury
- Metals
- Methoxyclor
- Naphthalene
- Night Shift Work
- Nitrogen Dioxide
- Noise
- Oral Contraceptives
- Organochlorine Pesticides
- Organophosphate Pesticides
- Ozone
- PAHs
- Parabens
- Particulate Matter
- PCBs
- Pesticides
- PFAS
- Phenols
- Phthalates
- Processed Food
- PVC
- Radiation: Ionizing
- Radiation: Non-Ionizing
- Soda
- Stress
- Sugar
- Tobacco
- Toluene
- Trichloroethylene
- Triclosan
- Ultraviolet Radiation
- UV Filters
- Vinyl Chloride
Select the Study Tags
Sort By
- Relevance
- Title (A to Z)
- Title (Z to A)
- Publication Year (Ascending)
- Publication Year (Descending)
- Authors (A to Z)
- Authors (Z to A)
2025
J Occup Environ Med
A French case-control study of 1,230 breast cancer patients and 1,315 controls examined occupational exposure to 49 common workplace chemicals and found elevated breast cancer risk associated with 12 agents. Women with the highest cumulative exposure showed increased risk ranging from 33% to 139% for chemicals including synthetic and natural fibers, plastics, organic dyes, nitrogen oxides, anesthetic gases, and various industrial compounds. The associations were generally stronger in premenopausal women compared to postmenopausal women. These findings suggest certain occupational exposures may play a role in breast cancer development, though larger studies with more detailed exposure assessments are needed to confirm these results.
2024
Environ Int
A comprehensive French study of over 10,000 women examined exposure to eight different air pollutants simultaneously and identified that women exposed to high levels of nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), particulate matter, and PCB153 had a 38-61% increased risk of breast cancer compared to women with low pollution exposure. Using advanced statistical modeling that groups women by their combined pollution exposure patterns rather than examining pollutants individually, researchers found that specific combinations of high pollutant exposures were strongly associated with elevated breast cancer risk. This study provides important evidence that the combined “cocktail effect” of multiple air pollutants, particularly traffic-related pollution (NO₂) and industrial chemicals (PCB153), may significantly increase breast cancer risk beyond what individual pollutants cause alone.
2024
Int J Environ Res Public Health
A systematic review of 25 epidemiological studies (2013-2022) found that seven out of eight investigated outdoor air pollutants showed significant associations with increased breast cancer risk, with benzo[a]pyrene showing the strongest relationship. The review found that 100% of studies examining nitrogen oxides (NOₓ), 83% of PM₂.₅ studies, 69% of nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) studies, and 43% of PM₁₀ studies demonstrated positive associations with breast cancer risk, with hazard ratios ranging from 1.05-1.56 and odds ratios from 1.03-1.86, while ozone and cadmium showed negative or no associations. These findings strengthen the evidence that outdoor air pollution—particularly traffic-related pollutants and fine particulate matter—contributes to breast cancer development, though the authors note that further research is needed to establish causal mechanisms, particularly through epigenetic pathways, and acknowledge that the review’s focus on English-language articles from developed countries may limit generalizability.
2023
Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev
A pooled analysis of six European cohorts including 199,719 women followed for 3.6 million person-years found that long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅) was associated with a 6% increased breast cancer risk per 5 μg/m³ increase. The association was strongest among middle-aged women (ages 50-54) and never-smokers, and notably, the cohorts studied represented the lower range of air pollution concentrations in Europe, suggesting that even relatively low levels of air pollution may contribute to breast cancer risk. These findings add to mounting evidence that air pollution—particularly fine particulate matter from traffic, industry, and combustion sources—is an environmental breast cancer risk factor operating independently of established risk factors, with important implications for public health policy, urban planning, and air quality regulations aimed at reducing population-level cancer burden, especially given that air pollution exposure is largely involuntary and affects entire populations.