Research Results
Beta Version
Use the search bar below to find studies, or apply one or more filters to narrow your results. See our list of keywords to guide your search.
Search by keyword
Select
Select
- All Risk Factors
- Air Pollution
- Alcohol
- Antimicrobials
- Artificial sweeteners
- Bisphenols
- Body Weight
- Breast Density
- Chemical Mixtures
- Chemicals in products
- Cleaning Products
- Diet
- Exercise
- Family History
- Furniture & Electronics
- Genetics
- Gut Health
- Hair Dye
- Hormones
- Inflammation
- Job
- Light at night
- Metals
- Neighborhood
- Night Shift Work
- Noise
- Non-stick Pans & Waterproof Gear
- Oral Contraceptives
- PAHs
- Parabens
- PCBs
- Personal Care Products
- Pesticides
- PFAS
- Pharmaceuticals
- Place-based
- Plastic
- Pregnancy & Breastfeeding
- Processed Food
- Puberty Age
- Race/Ethnicity
- Radiation
- Red meat
- Scented Products & Soft Plastic
- Sleeping Patterns
- Soda
- Stress
- Sugar
- Sunscreen
- Tobacco
- Vitamin D
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select the Chemical Agents
- All Chemical Agents
- 1,1,2,2-TCA
- 1,3-Butadiene
- Acrolein
- Aldrin
- Alkylphenols
- Antimicrobials
- Antimicrobials: QACs, Triclosan, Triclocarban
- Aromatic Amines
- Arsenic
- Artificial Sweeteners
- Atrazine
- Benzene
- Bisphenols
- Cadmium
- Chlordane
- Chlorpyrifos
- DDT
- Dibutyl Phthalate
- Dichlorvos
- Dieldrin
- Dioxins
- ell/
- Ethanol (alcohol)
- Ethyl Benzene
- Ethylene Oxide
- Flame Retardants
- Food
- Formaldehyde
- Glyphosate
- Heptachlor
- Hormones
- Insulin
- Lead
- Light at Night
- Mercury
- Metals
- Methoxyclor
- Naphthalene
- Night Shift Work
- Nitrogen Dioxide
- Noise
- Oral Contraceptives
- Organochlorine Pesticides
- Organophosphate Pesticides
- Ozone
- PAHs
- Parabens
- Particulate Matter
- PCBs
- Pesticides
- PFAS
- Phenols
- Phthalates
- Processed Food
- PVC
- Radiation: Ionizing
- Radiation: Non-Ionizing
- Soda
- Stress
- Sugar
- Tobacco
- Toluene
- Trichloroethylene
- Triclosan
- Ultraviolet Radiation
- UV Filters
- Vinyl Chloride
Select the Study Tags
Sort By
- Relevance
- Title (A to Z)
- Title (Z to A)
- Publication Year (Ascending)
- Publication Year (Descending)
- Authors (A to Z)
- Authors (Z to A)
2018
Eur J Epidemiol
This large international study pooling data from over 13,000 women across five countries found that night shift work increased breast cancer risk by 26% in pre-menopausal women, with the risk rising substantially for those working longer shifts (≥10 hours), more frequent nights (≥3 nights per week), or longer durations (≥10 years). Pre-menopausal women working both long durations and high frequency had a 2.5 times higher breast cancer risk, with current or recent night workers at higher risk than those who had stopped more than two years ago. Notably, no increased risk was found in post-menopausal women, and the elevated risk was primarily for estrogen receptor-positive tumors, particularly those that were also HER2-positive, suggesting that disruption of hormones and circadian rhythms during reproductive years may be key factors in how night work affects breast cancer risk.
2018
Breast Cancer Res
A nationwide study of 22,466 Danish female nurses found that long-term exposure to road traffic Noise was associated with increased breast cancer risk, particularly for hormone receptor-positive tumors. For every 10-decibel increase in 24-year average Noise levels at their residence, women showed a 23% increased risk of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer and a 21% increased risk of progesterone receptor-positive (PR+) breast cancer, with no significant association for hormone receptor-negative tumors. The association was especially strong among nurses who worked night shifts, showing a 236% increased risk of ER+ breast cancer compared to a 21% increase in those not working nights. These findings suggest that chronic traffic Noise exposure may contribute to breast cancer development, potentially through stress-related hormonal pathways, with night shift work potentially amplifying this risk.
2023
Occup Environ Med
A prospective cohort study of 33,359 Finnish public sector workers followed until 2016 found that shift work—both with and without night shifts—was associated with approximately double the breast cancer risk among women aged 50 or older after 10 or more years of follow-up (101% and 105% increased risk, respectively). However, no overall association was found when examining the entire cohort regardless of age or duration, and when historical shift work exposure data were available in a subgroup, the association with longer exposure duration was not statistically significant. These findings suggest that the breast cancer risk from shift work may primarily affect older women with prolonged exposure, though the authors acknowledge that incomplete information on the intensity and patterns of night work exposure may have weakened the observed associations.
2023
Ann Agric Environ Med
A case-control study of 111 postmenopausal women with breast cancer and 111 controls found that shift work was associated with a 165% increased breast cancer risk, but this risk was dramatically amplified by body weight status. Overweight shift workers showed a staggering 884% increased breast cancer risk compared to normal-weight women who had never worked shifts, indicating a powerful synergistic effect between shift work and excess body weight. With 72% of breast cancer cases having a history of shift work compared to 49% of controls, these findings suggest that the combination of circadian disruption from shift work and metabolic dysfunction from excess weight creates a particularly high-risk scenario, highlighting the urgent need for targeted prevention strategies—including weight management and lifestyle interventions—specifically for women working non-standard hours.
2022
Sleep Breath
A comprehensive meta-analysis of 31 prospective cohort studies including 9.3 million participants found that night-shift work was associated with a modest but statistically significant 2.9% increased breast cancer risk overall, with risk escalating to 8.6% for women working night shifts for more than 10 years and 5.3% for rotating night-shift work specifically. Night-shift workers also showed a 3.1% increased risk of cardiovascular mortality compared to day workers, highlighting broader health impacts beyond cancer. These findings provide strong epidemiological evidence that chronic circadian disruption from night-shift work increases breast cancer risk in a dose-dependent manner, with implications for the millions of women worldwide working non-standard hours in healthcare, manufacturing, transportation, and service industries—suggesting the need for policy interventions to limit long-term night-shift exposure and provide enhanced health monitoring for affected workers.
2022
Chin J Ind Hyg Occup Dis
A case-control study in Beijing examined 973 women (495 breast cancer patients and 478 controls) to identify occupational risk factors for breast cancer. The research found that women with a history of night shift work had a 70% increased risk of breast cancer, while those who worked mostly standing had double the risk compared to those who sat or alternated positions. The study concludes that night shift work and prolonged standing at work are significant occupational risk factors for female breast cancer. Establishing regular sleep schedules and avoiding extended periods of standing may help prevent breast cancer among working women.
2021
Int J Environ Res Pubilc Health
A case-control study of 494 breast cancer cases and 515 healthy controls in Poland’s Lodz region (2015-2019) found that night shift work was the third most important breast cancer risk factor after high BMI and short/no breastfeeding, ranking before early menstruation, late menopause, nulliparity, and smoking. Night work increased breast cancer risk 2.34-fold, with high-intensity night work showing an even greater 2.66-fold increase, and the harmful effects were influenced by intensity, frequency, rotation patterns, and cumulative years of night shift exposure. The findings support the IARC’s 2019 classification of night shift work as probably carcinogenic (Group 2A) and emphasize the need for ergonomic recommendations to minimize breast cancer risk among night shift workers through optimized scheduling practices.
2021
BMC Women's Health
A meta-analysis of 26 studies including over 1.3 million participants found that short-term night-shift work (<10 years) was associated with a 13% increased breast cancer risk, but surprisingly, long-term night-shift work (≥10 years) showed no statistically significant increased risk (8% increase, not significant). Flight attendants with long overnight flights showed elevated breast cancer risk, though unmeasured confounders may have influenced these results, and the increased risk in short-term workers was most robust in case-control studies that adjusted for reproductive factors and family history. The paradoxical finding that short-term but not long-term night-shift work showed significant associations contradicts the expected dose-response relationship and may reflect healthy worker bias (where women susceptible to night-shift effects leave such work before reaching 10 years), methodological limitations in measuring long-term exposures, or unmeasured confounding factors that accumulate differently over time.
2020
Int J Environ Res Public Health
A case-control study of 494 breast cancer patients and 515 healthy women in Poland found that night-shift work was associated with a 161% increased breast cancer risk, even after adjusting for other cancer risk factors including BMI, smoking, reproductive history, age, location, and education. While 51.9% of breast cancer cases had a history of shift work compared to 34.1% of controls (108% increased risk overall), further analysis revealed that only night shifts—not other shift patterns—significantly increased risk, showing a 120% increased risk after adjustment for confounders. Given that Poland has a high percentage of night-shift workers and the dramatically elevated cancer risk observed, the authors call for government action on prophylactic measures and workplace policies to protect this vulnerable population from occupational cancer hazards.
2020
Medicina
A systematic review of 12 studies examining nurses and shift work found that most studies showed an association between breast cancer and consecutive rotating night shifts prolonged over time, with risk increasing particularly during early adulthood and after 5 or more years of working 6 or more consecutive night shifts. The review identified disruption of circadian rhythm and alterations in peripheral clock genes and reproductive hormones as key mechanisms linking night shift work to breast cancer development, with potential roles for melatonin suppression and epigenetic changes including telomere alterations. These findings are particularly concerning given that nursing is a predominantly female profession requiring 24-hour staffing, suggesting the need for workplace policies that limit consecutive night shifts and total years of night work exposure, along with further research to establish definitive causal mechanisms and identify protective strategies for the millions of women working night shifts globally.
2019
Arch Med Res
A case-control study of 101 incident breast cancer cases and 101 matched controls at the Instituto de Seguridad Social del Estado de México y Municipios found that women who worked night shifts had 8.58-fold higher odds of breast cancer compared to those who never worked nights (OR=8.58; 95% CI: 2.19-33.8), while breastfeeding was protective (OR=0.12; 95% CI: 0.02-0.60) and early menarche ≤12 years increased risk (OR=18.58; 95% CI: 2.19-148). Despite the small sample size yielding wide confidence intervals, these findings from Mexican women are consistent with studies from other countries positively associating night shift work with breast cancer risk. The results support the hypothesis that night shift work involving circadian disruption increases breast cancer risk, though the large effect size and wide confidence intervals suggest the need for larger studies with more precise estimates to confirm these associations in Mexican populations.
2019
Chronobiol Int
A nested case-control study of 39,686 postmenopausal women in the California Teachers Study found that women with a definite evening chronotype (“night owls”) had a 20% increased breast cancer risk compared to definite morning chronotypes (“morning larks”), even after adjusting for established breast cancer risk factors. Importantly, this association was observed in a population without substantial night shift work history, suggesting that chronotype itself—the behavioral manifestation of an individual’s underlying circadian rhythm—may be an independent breast cancer risk factor beyond the effects of occupational circadian disruption. These findings raise the intriguing possibility that evening chronotypes may be more susceptible to environmental circadian disruption from factors like artificial light exposure, social jet lag (mismatch between biological and social timing), or irregular sleep-wake patterns, and warrant further investigation in other non-shift worker populations to confirm whether innate circadian preference represents a novel, modifiable risk factor for breast cancer through behavioral interventions targeting sleep timing and light exposure patterns.
2018
Scand J Work Environ Health
A comprehensive review of seven meta-analyses published 2013-2016 examining night shift work and breast cancer risk (collectively including 30 cohort and case-control studies from 1996-2016) found that pooled effect sizes for ever/never night shift work exposure ranged from 0.99 (95% CI: 0.95-1.03, N=10 cohort studies) to 1.40 (95% CI: 1.13-1.73, N=9 high-quality studies), with most showing statistically significant between-study heterogeneity but no evidence of publication bias, while estimates for duration, frequency, and cumulative exposure were scarce and mostly non-significant. Meta-analyses of cohort studies, Asian populations, and more fully-adjusted studies generally yielded lower pooled estimates than case-control, European/American, or minimally-adjusted studies, and AMSTAR 2 quality assessment revealed only one meta-analysis was strong in critical quality domains. The findings show fairly consistent modest elevations in breast cancer risk for ever/never night shift work exposure but inconclusive results for other shift work metrics, highlighting the need for future evaluations incorporating high-quality meta-analyses with better individual study quality appraisal to clarify the relationship between specific night shift work characteristics (duration, frequency, timing) and breast cancer risk.